Long-Term Mesh Exposure 5 Years Following Minimally Invasive Total Hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to assess long-term mesh complications following total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: In this second extension study, women from a multicenter randomized trial were followed for more than 36 months after surgery. Owing to COVID-19, participants were assessed through either in-person visits or telephone questionnaires. The primary outcome was the incidence of permanent suture or mesh exposure. Secondary outcomes included surgical success and late adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Out of the 200 initially enrolled participants, 82 women took part in this second extension study. Among them, 46 were in the permanent suture group, and 36 in the delayed absorbable group. The mean follow-up duration was 5.3 years, with the cumulative mesh or suture exposure of 9.9%, involving 18 cases, of which 4 were incident cases. Surgical success after more than 5 years stood at 95%, with few experiencing bothersome bulge symptoms or requiring retreatment. No serious adverse events occurred, including mesh erosion into the bladder or bowel. The most common adverse events were vaginal pain, bleeding, dyspareunia, and stress urinary incontinence, with no significant differences between suture types. CONCLUSION: The study found that mesh exposure risk gradually increased over time, reaching nearly 10% after more than 5 years post-surgery, regardless of suture type. However, surgical success remained high, and no delayed serious adverse events were reported.

Barbed Versus Nonbarbed Suture for Posterior Colporrhaphy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IMPORTANCE: There is limited literature or even consensus on the suture material used for posterior vaginal repairs. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare outcomes of barbed versus nonbarbed delayed absorbable suture used for posterior colporrhaphy. STUDY DESIGN: This study conducted a randomized controlled trial of 72 women undergoing posterior repair using standardized technique-concurrent procedures permitted with barbed (n = 36) or nonbarbed (n = 36) suture. Standardized examinations, validated questionnaires, and a visual analog scale (VAS) were completed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 months, and a telephone interview was conducted at 6 months. The primary outcome was posterior compartment pain at 6 weeks, measured by a VAS. RESULTS: Seventy-two women enrolled, with follow-up rates 6 weeks (100%), 6 months (90.3%), and 12 months (73.6%). Demographics were similar between groups. A VAS with movement was not different between groups at 6 weeks. The odds of experiencing vaginal pain, having myofascial pain on examination, or being sexually active postoperatively were not different between the groups. There were no differences in the length of posterior colporrhaphy, surgical times, or hospital length of stay between the groups. Suture passes were lower in the nonbarbed group (median, 4 vs 7; P = <0.001), and suture burden was higher in the nonbarbed group (median, 26.9 vs 10.5 cm; P = <0.001). There was overall improvement in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Short Form 20 prolapse and colorectal subscores but no differences between groups. Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire Short Form 12 scores improved, and dyspareunia decreased at 6 and 12 months in both groups. In addition, there were few anatomic recurrences at 6 weeks (0%) and 12 months (3.4%) and few adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no differences in primary or secondary outcomes; however, both suture types resulted in clinical improvements in quality-of-life measures and sexual function.

Long-Term Pain After Minimally Invasive Total Hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy.

IMPORTANCE: There are limited long-term data on patient-reported pain after surgical treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate pain in women undergoing minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy with a lightweight polypropylene Y-mesh (Upsylon) >2 years after surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This is a planned secondary analysis of a 5-site randomized trial comparing permanent versus absorbable suture for vaginal attachment of a lightweight polypropylene Y-mesh during total laparoscopic hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy in women with stage ≥2 uterovaginal prolapse. Our primary outcome was patient-reported pain or dyspareunia at >2 years. RESULTS: Of the 185 participants eligible for enrollment in the e-PACT study, 106 enrolled; 98 participants (96%) completed either in-person examinations or study questionnaires regarding pain and are included in this analysis. At >2 years, 28% reported any pain: 14% reported dyspareunia on questionnaires, 5% reported pelvic pain on questionnaires, and 14% of those who had an in-person examination reported pain. Of participants who reported pain or dyspareunia at baseline before surgery, 59% reported resolution of their symptoms >2 years. On multiple logistic regression controlling for age and baseline pain or dyspareunia, baseline pain or dyspareunia was associated with a nearly 3-fold increased risk of reporting any pain >2 years (adjusted odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-6.9). No women had repeat surgical intervention for pain. CONCLUSIONS: Although 60% of women report pain resolution >2 years after surgery, de novo pain was present in 1 of 5 women. Baseline history of pain or dyspareunia is the only factor associated with an increased likelihood of experiencing pain >2 years after surgery.

In-Person Versus Video Preoperative Visit: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: This study further supports virtual visits for gynecologic preoperative care. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine if preoperative video visits are noninferior to in-person visits in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Secondary objectives are as follows: patient satisfaction, convenience, visit duration, total perioperative visits, and patient travel time/distance. STUDY DESIGN: Noninferiority randomized-controlled trial of patients undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery randomized to in-person or video counseling. The primary outcome was a composite score on the Preoperative Preparedness Questionnaire. RESULTS: Demographics were similar except for higher body mass index (BMI) in the video group (29.5 vs 26.3; P = 0.01), and fewer patients in the video group used text messaging for health care delivery (40.7% vs 59.3%, P = 0.04). Video visits were noninferior to in-person visits in Preoperative Preparedness Questionnaire scores (62.5 ± 4.6 vs 63.0 ± 3.6; difference = 0.5; 95% confidence interval, -0.8, □). There was no difference in "strongly agree" response to question 11, "Overall, I feel prepared for my upcoming surgery" (79.6% vs 88.9%, P = 0.19). Satisfaction was higher for video visits based on composite Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Surgical Care Survey scores (31.3 ± 1.5 vs 30.5 ± 2, P = 0.02). Video visits were more convenient (100% vs 85.2%, P < 0.01), of shorter duration for patients (39.3 ± 14.0 minutes vs 55.9 ± 18.9 minutes; P < 0.01), and similar length for health care providers (28.8 ± 9.6 minutes vs 28.2 ± 9.8 minutes; P = 0.77). The video visit group had fewer office visits (2.0 vs 3.0, P < 0.01) and traveled 66 minutes ( P < 0.01) and 28 miles ( P < 0.01) less. CONCLUSION: Preoperative video visits are noninferior to in-person visits for preparing patients for pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Long-term mesh exposure after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to evaluate total and incident mesh exposure rates at least 2 years after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. Secondary aims were to evaluate surgical success and late adverse events. METHODS: This extension study included women previously enrolled in the multicenter randomized trial of permanent vs delayed-absorbable suture with lightweight mesh for > stage II uterovaginal prolapse. Owing to COVID-19, women were given the option of an in-person (questionnaires and examination) or telephone visit (questionnaires only). The primary outcome was total and incident suture or mesh exposure, or symptoms suggestive of mesh exposure in women without an examination. Secondary outcomes were surgical success, which was defined as no subjective bulge, no prolapse beyond the hymen, and no pelvic organ prolapse retreatment, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 182 out of 200 previously randomized participants were eligible for inclusion, of whom 106 (58%) women (78 in-person and 28 via questionnaire only) agreed to the extension study. At a mean of 3.9 years post-surgery, the rate of mesh or suture exposure was 7.7% (14 out of 182) of whom only 2 were incident cases reported after 1-year follow-up. None reported vaginal bleeding or discharge, dyspareunia, or penile dyspareunia. Surgical success was 93 out of 106 (87.7%): 13 out of 94 (13.8%) failed by bulge symptoms, 2 out of 78 (2.6%) by prolapse beyond the hymen, 1 out of 85 (1.2%) by retreatment with pessary, and 0 by retreatment with surgery. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of incident mesh exposure between 1 and 3.9 years post-surgery was low, success rates remained high, and there were no delayed serious adverse events.

A resident robotic curriculum utilizing self-selection and a web-based feedback tool.

To describe an obstetrics and gynecology residency robotic curriculum, facilitated by a web-based feedback and case-tracking tool, allowing for self-selection into advanced training. Phase I (Basic) was required for all residents and included online training modules, online assessment, and robotic bedside assistant dry lab. Phase II (Advanced) was elective console training. Before live surgery, 10 simulation drills completed to proficiency were required. A web-based tool was used for surgical feedback and case-tracking. Online assessments, drill reports, objective GEARS assessments, subjective feedback, and case-logs were reviewed (7/2018-6/2019). A satisfaction survey was reviewed. Twenty four residents completed Phase I training and 10 completed Phase II. To reach simulation proficiency, residents spent a median of 4.1 h performing required simulation drills (median of 10 (3, 26) attempts per drill) before live surgery. 128 post-surgical feedback entries were completed after performance as bedside assistant (75%, n = 96) and console surgeon (5.5%, n = 7). The most common procedure was hysterectomy 111/193 (58%). Resident console surgeons performed portions of 32 cases with a mean console time of 34.6 ± 19.5 min. Mean GEARS score 20.6 ± 3.7 (n = 28). Mean non-technical feedback results: communication (4.2 ± 0.8, n = 61), workload management (3.9 ± 0.9, n = 54), team skills (4.3 ± 0.8, n = 60). Residents completing > 50% of case assessed as "apprentice" 38.5% or "competent" 23% (n = 13). After curriculum change, 100% of surveyed attendings considered residents prepared for live surgical training, vs 17% (n = 6) prior to curriculum change [survey response rate 27/44 (61%)]. Attendings and residents were satisfied with curriculum; 95% and recommended continued use 90% (n = 19).This two-phase robotic curriculum allows residents to self-select into advanced training, alleviating many challenges of graduated robotic training.

Validation of a Simulation Model for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to validate a simulation model for robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSCP) that includes multiple steps: presacral dissection/mesh attachment, vaginal mesh attachment, and peritoneal closure. METHODS: An RSCP training model was developed. Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) experts and current FPMRS fellows were videotaped using the model; sessions were timed and scored using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) by 3 surgeon reviewers masked to participants' identities. Construct validity was measured by comparing performance on the model between experts and trainees. Interrater reliability was determined by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients for total GEARS scores. Face validity was assessed by a postprocedure questionnaire. RESULTS: Experts included 9 board-certified FPMRS physicians experienced in RSCP; trainees were 17 fellows. Experts practiced at 7 different institutions in the United States, and the majority (5/7) taught fellows. Trainees were from 7 institutions and in various years of training: postgraduate year (PGY) 5 (n = 6), PGY 6 (n = 5), and PGY 7 (n = 6). Experts' performances were rated significantly higher for total GEARS scores and for relevant domains of the GEARS scale. Intraclass correlation coefficient for the 3 reviewer pairs (0.96-0.99) indicated high interrater reliability. All participants "agreed/strongly agreed" that the model closely approximated live RSCP surgery and was useful for teaching and learning the procedure, indicating high face validity. CONCLUSIONS: This novel, multistep simulation model demonstrated construct validity and high interrater reliability. Face validity was also established. Consequently, this RSCP model could be used for surgical training and assessment of these discrete surgical skill steps.

Enhanced Recovery and Same-Day Discharge After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol was associated with a higher rate of same-day discharge after robot-assisted or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and to describe the safety and feasibility of same-day discharge after these procedures. METHODS: A historical control, retrospective cohort study of women undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy comparing rates of same-day discharge before and after implementation of an ERAS protocol was conducted. Secondary outcomes were obtained by comparing women discharged the same day with those discharged postoperative day ≥1, including postoperative complications and unplanned postoperative patient encounters within 30 days of surgery. Logistic regression was performed to control for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of the 166 women identified (83 before ERAS implementation; 83 after ERAS implementation), 43 underwent same-day discharge versus 123 admitted overnight. The rate of same-day discharge increased 28 percentage points after ERAS implementation (12% vs 40%, P < 0.01). Compared with women admitted overnight, same-day discharge women had shorter procedures (154 vs 173 minutes, P = 0.01), spent longer time in the postanesthesia care unit (130 vs 106 minutes, P = 0.01), and were more likely to be discharged with a Foley catheter (58% vs 28%, P < 0.01). After multivariable logistic regression analysis, ERAS was associated with increased odds of same-day discharge (odds ratio, 4.91; 95% confidence interval, 2.17-11.09). There were no differences in unplanned postoperative patient contacts or postoperative complications within 30 days between same-day discharge and overnight admission groups. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an ERAS protocol for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy was associated with a 3-fold increase in same-day discharge.

Twice-Daily Nitrofurantoin Administration Following Short-term Transurethral Catheterization After Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate if twice-daily nitrofurantoin for 5 days after discontinuation of transurethral catheterization decreases the rate of urinary tract infection (UTI) in women with postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after pelvic reconstructive surgery. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial conducted across 2 clinical sites between October 2017 and April 2019. Women with acute POUR after pelvic reconstructive surgery were included and randomized to nitrofurantoin (100 mg) or placebo twice-daily for 5 days. The primary outcome was clinically suspected UTI (defined as dysuria, frequency, and irritation in the absence of vaginal discharge) and/or culture-proven UTI (defined as greater than 105 colony forming units of a single organism) within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of adverse events related to study medication and medication adherence. RESULTS: Data from 164 participants were eligible for intention-to-treat analysis (nitrofurantoin, n = 82; placebo, n = 82). There were no significant demographic or intraoperative differences except for body mass index and race. Median duration of catheterization was 3 days (interquartile range, 2-5 days, P = 0.12). Fifteen women in the nitrofurantoin group and 14 women in the placebo group experienced UTI within 30 days (18.3% vs 17.1%; P = 0.84; odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-2.43). There were no study medication allergies; however, nausea was the most common intolerance. Most women in each group completed the study drug treatment (91.5% vs 86.4%, P = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Nitrofurantoin prophylaxis after transurethral catheter removal did not reduce the risk of UTI in women with acute POUR after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

A Cadaveric Simulation Model to Teach Suture Placement During Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to describe a cadaveric simulation model designed to teach sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) and to assess trainee performance, comfort, and skill with suture placement. METHODS: Nine invited participants from 3 institutions participated in cadaveric simulation training, consisting of a didactic lecture, technical demonstrations, and supervised execution of suture placement. Trainee self-perceived knowledge and confidence levels of SSLF were assessed before and after the educational intervention. Suture placement was assessed by expert faculty pelvic reconstructive surgeons. The number of attempts required by trainees for an anatomically safe suture placement was recorded. Participants completed a postintervention satisfaction survey. RESULTS: All 9 participants correctly identified where an SSLF suture should be placed on a printed image before the educational intervention, but only 33% achieved anatomically safe suture placement on the first attempt (mean ± SD, 2.88 ± 2.10 attempts). Four participants (44%) reported comfort with independently performing SSLF before the course. Of these, three (75%) required more than 1 attempt for successful suture placement. Mean ± SD distance of SSLF suture from the ischial spine was 1.90 ± 0.59 cm. All participants reported that they found the training helpful in learning the surgical steps and anatomy related to SSLF and would recommend it to others. CONCLUSIONS: A cadaveric simulation teaching model led to improved trainee-reported confidence with the operative steps and anatomy related to SSLF. Participants' prior knowledge of procedural steps and anatomy did not always transfer to adequate procedural skills for safe suture placement, suggesting the need for further simulation practice for fellow trainees.

Patient experience with enhanced recovery and early discharge after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to describe patient experiences with an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (SCP). METHODS: We conducted 14 semi-structured telephone interviews with women who had undergone SCP and were discharged the day of the surgery (POD#0, n = 7) or spent 1 night at the hospital (POD#1, n = 7). Interviews occurred between 2 and 6 weeks after surgery. We explored the following topics: patient preparedness, preoperative education, physical recovery, emotional recovery, and overall perception of the ERP. Interviewing continued until thematic saturation was achieved. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to identify relevant themes. RESULTS: Both POD#0 and POD#1 discharge patients reported largely positive experiences regarding their preparation for surgery, at-home recovery, and access to follow-up care. Yet for some patients, the accelerated pace of the ERP felt rushed and was perceived as an absence of care rather than as an advance in treatment. Patients that elected to stay the night lived farther from ready access to care, had less robust systems of postoperative support, and worried more about the management of their pre-existing conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Our research found that despite having consistently positive impressions of the ERP, patients shared common anxieties surrounding their surgeries including worries about access to care and the prospect of going home with a urinary catheter. Furthermore, we found that the therapeutic value of protocol recommendations such as early discharge must be made explicit to patients and often individualized to avoid being interpreted as sub-standard care.

A Novel Injection Technique for Extended-Release Local Anesthetic After Posterior Colporrhaphy and Perineorrhaphy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of vaginal intraoperative infiltration of liposomal bupivacaine on vaginal pain among patients undergoing posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial offered to women undergoing posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy with concomitant pelvic reconstructive procedures. Liposomal bupivacaine or normal saline placebo (30 mL) was injected into the posterior vaginal compartment and perineal body in 2- to 3-mL increments, using a systematic technique. All participants received 10-mL 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine prior to incision. Perioperative care was standardized. The primary outcome was vaginal pain as measured by a visual analog scale. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six women were screened, and 72 were included. Demographic characteristics were similar. Median visual analog scale was not different at any time point (P = 0.81). There were no differences in secondary outcomes, including narcotic use (37.5 vs 37.5 mg morphine equivalents, P = 0.51; placebo vs liposomal bupivacaine), time to first opioid (68 vs 89.5 minutes, P = 0.56), antiemetic doses (3 vs 2, P = 0.07), hospital length of stay (24 vs 21.9 hours, P = 0.98), length of stay in postanesthesia care unit (93 vs 100 minutes, P = 0.32), proportion of patients who had a bowel movement within the first 3 postoperative days (65.7 vs 59.5% P = 0.36), or successful voiding trials (45.7 vs 59.5%, P = 0.24). There were no differences in patient satisfaction or postoperative adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of pelvic reconstructive surgeries with posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy, there were no differences in pain scores or any secondary outcomes between liposomal bupivacaine and placebo injected into the posterior vaginal compartment.

Permanent Compared With Absorbable Suture for Vaginal Mesh Fixation During Total Hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare mesh and permanent suture exposure rates in the first year after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy with a light-weight polypropylene mesh using permanent or delayed absorbable sutures. METHODS: Across five centers in the United States, women were randomized to permanent or delayed absorbable suture for vaginal attachment of a Y-mesh during hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy for stage II prolapse and worse. The primary outcome was mesh or permanent suture exposure in the first year after surgery. The secondary outcome was to compare a composite measure for success defined as leading edge of prolapse not beyond the hymen and apex not descended more than one third vaginal length, and no subjective bulge and no prolapse retreatment. Patients completed a pelvic examination including the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system and questionnaires at baseline, 6 weeks and 1 year postsurgery. A sample size of 80 per group was planned to compare the rate of mesh or permanent suture exposure in the permanent compared with delayed absorbable groups. RESULTS: From April 2015 to May 2019, 204 patients (n=102 permanent; n=102 delayed absorbable) were randomized. One hundred ninety-eight women had follow-up data, with 182 (93%) completing 1-year follow-up: 95 of 99 (96%) permanent, 87 of 101 (86%) delayed absorbable. The total rate of mesh or permanent suture exposure was 12 of 198 (6.1%): 5.1% for permanent compared with 7.0% for delayed absorbable (risk ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.24-2.22). The majority (9/12) were asymptomatic. Composite success was 93% for permanent compared with 95% for delayed absorbable suture, P=.43). Six (3.0%) women had a serious adverse event. CONCLUSION: Suture type used for vaginal graft attachment did not influence mesh or permanent suture exposure rates. FUNDING SOURCE: Boston Scientific Corporation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02277925.

Optimizing learner engagement during mental skills training: A pilot study of small group vs. individualized training.

BACKGROUND: Mental skills limit surgical residents' skill decay resulting from stress. However, optimal mental skills delivery is unknown. We sought to compare the impact of implementing our curriculum in small groups and individually. METHODS: At baseline, residents completed assessments of mental skills and laparoscopic suturing. Residents then participated in a comprehensive mental skills curriculum at two institutions. At the first institution, residents completed small group training, whereas residents at the second institution trained individually. Following mental skills training, residents completed FLS training, at which time they completed the Short State Stress Questionnaire detailing their engagement. At post-test, residents completed baseline assessments again. RESULTS: Twenty-one residents completed training. Small groups were less engaged after training than individuals (Group average engagement: 26.4 vs. Individual average engagement: 29.6, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Delivering mental skills individually facilitates greater engagement than training in small groups, but regardless of delivery method, our MSC can achieve the same outcomes on surgical performance.

Anterior Wall Success at 1 Year After Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension and Sacral Colpopexy.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to evaluate 1-year anterior wall anatomic success rates for vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) and minimally invasive sacral colpopexy (SCP) using delayed-absorbable suture. Secondary objectives included assessment of apical success, mesh or suture exposure, and postoperative quality of life (QoL) measures 12 months after surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including women who underwent a hysterectomy with concomitant USLS or SCP with delayed-absorbable suture from January 2011 to December 2015 with 1-year follow-up. Successful anterior vaginal wall support was defined as Ba of less than 0. Successful apical support was defined as no apical descent (point C) greater than one half of the total vaginal length. In addition, 1-year QoL questionnaires were measured postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 282 women were identified. Sixty-two women (31 vaginal USLS and 31 SCP) met inclusion criteria. Demographics were similar between groups except for a higher body mass index in the USLS group (27.5 ± 5.6 kg/m vs 24.1 ± 3.3 kg/m, P < 0.05). Preoperative POP-Q was mostly stage II and III. At 1-year, anatomic success rates for the anterior compartment were 66.7% versus 90.3% for USLS and SCP groups, respectively (P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in apical success (P = 1.00) or QoL scores between groups at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic success rates at 1 year using delayed-absorbable suture were better for SCP when using the anterior wall as a measure of success, but there were no significant differences in apical success rates, mesh or suture exposure, and QoL measures between groups.

Patient perceptions of same-day discharge after minimally invasive gynecologic and pelvic reconstructive surgery.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that same-day discharge after minimally invasive gynecological and pelvic reconstructive surgery is safe and cost effective and does not result in increased readmissions when compared with inpatient surgery. However, few studies have assessed patient satisfaction with same-day discharge after minimally invasive gynecological and pelvic reconstructive surgery. Increased knowledge of patients' values allows for evidence-based, patient-centered perioperative care and guides perioperative counseling. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to evaluate patient perceptions of same-day discharge after minimally invasive gynecological and pelvic reconstructive surgery, to identify barriers to patient acceptance of same-day discharge, and to assess changes in patient acceptance before and after reading an evidence-based statement regarding same-day discharge. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional survey study. All English-speaking new patients presenting to a subspecialty, benign gynecological surgery clinic, including female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery and minimally invasive gynecologic surgery providers, were invited to participate. The survey included an evidence-based statement about same-day discharge. Participants were asked to rate their comfort with same-day discharge before and after reading this statement. RESULTS: Ninety-six percent of women (208 of 216) who were approached completed the study. The majority rated their overall health and mental or emotional health as good or very good (61.1% and 64.9%). Most (82.7%) completed at least some college. Most (86.1%) reported having at least 1 prior surgery and 68.8% reported same-day discharge after a prior surgery: 74.8% rated their prior experience with same-day discharge favorably. The majority of respondents (86.1%) reported they would feel comfortable with same-day discharge. The most important cited reasons for going home the same day as surgery included sleeping in own bed (73.4%) and being with family (61.8%). The most important cited reasons for staying overnight in the hospital included anticipated better pain control (58.9%) and decreased overall complications (43.0%). Forty percent believed it would be easier to take care of a catheter if needed in the hospital. Patients who reported living alone and those 65 years old and older were less likely to feel comfortable with same-day discharge (odds ratio, 0.39, 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.91). Of the 29 patients who reported at baseline that they would not feel comfortable with same-day discharge, most (65.5%) changed their minds after reading an evidence-based statement about same-day discharge. When asked if their surgeon recommended it, almost all patients (96.1%) reported they would feel comfortable with same-day discharge. CONCLUSION: Among new patients presenting to a subspecialty, benign gynecologic surgery clinic including female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery and minimally invasive gynecological surgery providers, most perceive same-day discharge favorably following minimally invasive gynecological and pelvic reconstructive surgery. Women who live alone and those aged 65 years and older feel less comfortable with same-day discharge. While an evidence-based statement regarding the benefits and safety of same-day discharge further improves patient acceptance, direct surgeon counseling may be more important to establish discharge goals.

Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Simulation Model and Associated Hierarchical Task Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There are limited robotic dry lab training resources that include presacral dissection with vaginal and sacral mesh attachment for robotic sacrocolpopexy. Our objective was to create a simulation model to resemble the anatomy encountered during robotic sacrocolpopexy. Additionally, we sought to outline the steps required to complete a robotic sacrocolpopexy by performing a hierarchical task analysis. With the results of the hierarchical task analysis, we assessed the model's ability to provide an adequate platform for completion of robotic sacrocolpopexy procedural steps. METHOD: This observational simulation study was divided into two phases. Phase 1 included model development. Phase 2 involved development of the hierarchical task analysis and assessment of the model. EXPERIENCE: After model creation, six experts each performed a robotic sacrocolpopexy using the model. Overall, experts agreed that the model replicated opening the peritoneum, presacral dissection, suturing on the anterior and posterior vagina, and presacral mesh attachment. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate construction and use of a robotic sacrocolpopexy simulation model to aid surgeons in training. Further, the hierarchical task analysis provides a method to assess the model's ability to replicate each step of robotic sacrocolpopexy.

Mental skills training limits the decay in operative technical skill under stressful conditions: Results of a multisite, randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Overwhelming stress in the operating room can lead to decay in operative performance, particularly for residents who lack experience. Mental skills training can minimize deterioration in performance during challenging situations. We hypothesized that residents trained on mental skills would outperform controls under increased stress conditions in the simulated operating room. METHODS: Residents from Indiana University enrolled voluntarily in this institutional review board-approved study. Residents were stratified according to baseline characteristics and randomized into a mental skills and control group. Both groups trained to proficiency in laparoscopic suturing, but only the mental skills group received mental skills training. After training, technical skill transfer was assessed under regular and stressful conditions on a porcine model. Performance was assessed using an objective suturing score. The Test of Performance Strategies was used to assess the use of mental skills. Data were combined and compared with data that had been collected at Carolinas Healthcare System because residents underwent the same protocol. RESULTS: A total of 38 residents completed all study elements. There were no differences in the effects observed between sites. We observed no group differences at baseline. The groups achieved similar technical performance at baseline, posttest, and transfer test under low-stress conditions, but the mental skills group outperformed the control group during the transfer test under high-stress conditions. CONCLUSION: Our comprehensive mental skills curriculum implemented with surgery residents at two institutions was effective at minimizing the deterioration of resident technical performance under stressful conditions compared with controls. These results provide further evidence for the effectiveness of mental skills training to optimize surgery trainees' technical performance during challenging clinical situations.

Performance variability during training on simulators is associated with skill transfer.

BACKGROUND: Expert performance is characterized by consistency. The degree of variability of performance from repetition to repetition during proficiency-based simulator training could potentially indicate acquisition of expertise. We hypothesized that learners with less variability in performance during simulator training would achieve greater performance at the end of training and improved transfer of skills to a live, anesthetized, porcine model. METHODS: The performance of 93 subjects (surgery residents and medical students) who had participated in 3 randomized controlled trials was analyzed for variability. All participants had trained in laparoscopic suturing on the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) simulator. Their performance had been assessed on the simulator before (baseline) and after training (posttest) and on a live, anesthetized, porcine model (transfer test). We computed the coefficient of variations of suturing scores during training for each participant. Linear regression was used to assess whether variability in performance during training predicted posttest and transfer-test scores. RESULTS: Decreased practice variability in performance was associated with greater scores in posttests and transfer tests. For each percent decrease in variability performance, posttest scores increased by 3.8 points (P < .001) and transfer-test scores increased by 3.0 points (P < .001). Greater mean scores during practice were associated with greater scores on the transfer test (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Decreased variability in performance during practice on simulators is associated with improved performance at the end of training and during transfer to a live, anesthetized, porcine model. These findings suggest that variability in performance during simulator training may be used to track the progress and readiness of a trainee for the clinical environment. Further studies are needed to verify the robustness of this potentially new metric of performance.